Members’ Publications

New book: Stefania Cicillini, The Language Factor in English-Medium Instruction (EMI). A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Language Gains, Roma, Carocci, 2025

Books, Members' Publications, News /

This volume deals with a crucial, but underestimated, dimension of English-medium instruction (EMI) in higher education, namely the students’ language experience and the improvement in English proficiency, the latter being one of the key motivating factors to opt for EMI. The mixed-method case study presented in this volume is a longitudinal investigation of the participants’ language progress, spanning over two academic years. Although English language outcomes are neither mentioned in the definitions of EMI nor in the courses’ syllabi, indeed, the EMI experience provides a large amount of language input for students, which is both assimilated consciously and partly as a result of incidental language learning. On reviewing previous literature on EMI, this book addresses some key questions such as the impact of EMI on the students’ English skills, the increase of proficiency while focused on subject-oriented activities and in particular whether English improvement is voluntary or incidental. The data retrieved from questionnaires and language tests administered to one-hundred medical students enrolled in an Italian university provide valuable insights into the language factor in EMI, which may be usefully exploited and extended to other higher educational contexts.  Stefania Cicillini, The Language Factor in English-Medium Instruction (EMI). A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Language Gains, Roma, Carocci, pp. 208 ISBN: 9788829024292, Pp. 208 

New book: Stefania Cicillini, The Language Factor in English-Medium Instruction (EMI). A Longitudinal Study of Students’ Language Gains, Roma, Carocci, 2025 Read More »

New Book: Elena Mattei, The Language of Persuasion on Instagram. A Systemic Functional Approach to Multimodal Tourism Discourse, Routledge, 2025

Books, Members' Publications, News, Uncategorized /

This book offers a systematic, interdisciplinary investigation into the language of persuasion in contemporary tourism discourse, with a focus on English-language travel boards’ use of Instagram and official websites. Drawing on Corpus Linguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics, it examines how linguistic and visual resources are strategically deployed to construct idealized representations of destinations and evoke positive emotional responses. Through a multimodal analysis, the volume explores recurring linguistic patterns, the role of platform-specific dissemination, and how discourse constructs power dynamics between destinations and prospective tourists. By combining empirical methods with critical discourse and sociological perspectives, the book sheds light on how emotionally charged, consumer-oriented narratives may reinforce broader socioeconomic inequalities and contribute to unsustainable travel practices. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing debates on digital persuasion and literacy, media framing, and the ideological function of tourism communication, recommending approaches to integrate data-driven, highly persuasive strategies and eco-sensitive narratives. This book will be of interest to scholars and students in discourse analysis, digital communication, tourism studies, marketing, and linguistics, as well as professionals interested in the mechanisms behind strategic, promotional narratives and their potential impact on social and environmental sustainability. Elena Mattei, The Language of Persuasion on Instagram. A Systemic Functional Approach to Multimodal Tourism Discourse. Routledge  ISBN 9781032937489   288 Pages 44 B/W Illustrations

New Book: Elena Mattei, The Language of Persuasion on Instagram. A Systemic Functional Approach to Multimodal Tourism Discourse, Routledge, 2025 Read More »

New Publication: Communicating Medical Science in the Digital Age: Culture, Knowledge, Expertise, Practices edited by G. Tessuto, S. M. Maci, M. J. Zerbe, Cambridge Scholars, 2025

Books, Members' Publications, News /

Communicating Medical Science in the Digital Age: Culture, Knowledge, Expertise, Practicesedited by G. Tessuto, S. M. Maci, M. J. Zerbe, Cambridge Scholars, June 2025 The rapid development of the Internet and social media platforms hastransformed the landscape of medical science communication where avariety of societal stakeholders, including the research academy,healthcare professionals, policymakers, and patients, increasingly turn tothe readily usable functionalities of online information and knowledgeplatforms. This transformation has had a significant impact on digitalcommunication within the medical academy and the healthcare sector asa whole. Opportunities are spawning an increasingly diverse digitalecosystem of less formal practices of medical scholarly communicationon web and social media platforms (research blogs, tweets, newspaperarticles, press interviews, ResearchGate, WikiPathways, info-graphicsand video-abstracts), making the scientific process more democratic andresponsive to societal needs and fostering ‘open’, rapid scientificcommunication between researchers, citizens, and other societal actors.This book brings together academics and practitioners from the area oflinguistics and other fields to critically discuss and rethink emergingtrends and variations in medical science communication models whereculture, knowledge, expertise, and identity are played out, contributing tothe discursive study of texts and genres that matter to internal and externalprocesses and practices of medical science communication This book is part of a series. View the full series, “Medical Discourse and Communication”, here. ISBN: 1-0364-4566-6 ISBN13: 978-1-0364-4566-9 Pages: 398 Cambridge Scholars Publishing https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-0364-4566-9

New Publication: Communicating Medical Science in the Digital Age: Culture, Knowledge, Expertise, Practices edited by G. Tessuto, S. M. Maci, M. J. Zerbe, Cambridge Scholars, 2025 Read More »

The Song of Songs and Its Tradition in Renaissance Love Lyric

Books, Members' Publications, News /

Camilla Caporicci Oxford University Press, 2024, pp. 480. ISBN: 9780192848833 Traditionally attributed to King Solomon, the Song of Songs is one of the most fascinating and controversial biblical books, and played an essential role in the shaping of European spirituality and culture. Combining a sensual and deeply lyrical celebration of love with a well-established tradition of Christian allegorical interpretation, this text, crucial to both the Middle Ages and the early modern period, held a particular appeal for poets. The Song of Songs and Its Tradition in Renaissance Love Lyric is the first systematic and wide-ranging investigation of the multifaceted use of the Song of Songs in Renaissance love lyric poetry, with specific attention to Italian, French, and, especially, English poetic production. At the same time, this investigation is embedded into a narrative that, comprising two initial chapters devoted to medieval poetry and to Francesco Petrarca, represents an unprecedented attempt to trace the role of the Song of Songs in the rise and development of the European love lyric, following its path – or rather, one of its paths – from the medieval origins of this tradition to the end of the sixteenth century. While the comparative standpoint characterizing this study fosters a deeper comprehension of the evolution of the European love lyric, its multidisciplinary approach, which considers the Song of Songs as the centre of a web of dynamics pertaining to the fields of literature, philosophy, theology, and religious and cultural history, contributes to the understanding of the thought and spirit of ages crucial to the shaping of European culture.

The Song of Songs and Its Tradition in Renaissance Love Lyric Read More »

CfP: Special issue on “The language of judges: exploring the discourse of separate opinions (Guest editors: Jekaterina Nikitina, University of MilanKatia Peruzzo, University of Trieste)

Members' Publications /

Call for Papers – Special issue on “The language of judges: exploring the discourse of separate opinions“ Guest editors:Jekaterina Nikitina, University of MilanKatia Peruzzo, University of Trieste AbstractJudicial discourse has attracted its fair share of academic attention from a variety of perspectives, and yet, one of its most characteristic realizations remains somewhat understudied. Separate opinions, also known as votum separatum (Goźdź Roszkowski 2020: 381), are used by judges, at least in certain judicial systems, to convey their individual views on a legal case. Unlike the majority opinion, which represents the official decision of the court, a separate opinion provides standpoints of a single judge or a group of similar-minded judges that diverge from the majority opinion, of those judges “who lost their case in camera” (Bruinsma 2006: 360), and want to disagree, clarify or expand on a particular point. The discourse of separate opinions is a fascinating terrain for an exploration from a legal linguistics standpoint (Goźdź-Roszkowski 2020; McKeown 2021). It opens a window into the mechanisms of legal argumentation (Goźdź-Roszkowski 2024) and dialogical banter (Garzone 2016; Extebe 2020) between the majority and the minority. Since “dissident judges are not bound by the straightjacket of the majority judgment and its legal validity, [they can] […] express their opinions freely and follow their own convictions” (Bruinsma 2006: 360). Separate opinions are also pragmatically intriguing (Galdia 2022), as they must balance between some open confrontation and considerations of professional politeness (Kurzon 2001; Nikitina 2025, forthcoming) in their evaluative sections. At an international level, these opinions become curious instances of L2 legal rhetoric, as judges working in international courts must formulate their thoughts in the court’s official language(s), frequently different from their native ones. We invite proposals dealing with but not limited to the following perspectives on separate judicial opinions: Legal discourseLegal argumentationLegal genresDialogism and polyphony in legal discourseLegal drafting in L2 and legal translationCreativity in legal discourseLegal pragmaticsEvaluation and stance References Bruinsma, F. (2006). Les Opinions Séparées Des Juges à La Cour Européenne Des Droits de l’Homme. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 24 (2): 358–362. Etxabe, Julen. (2022). The Dialogical Language of Law, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 59 (2): 429-515. Galdia, M. (2022) Foundations of pragmatic Legal Linguistics. Comparative Legilinguistics, 51: 241-278. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/cl.51.2022.11 Garzone, G. (2016). Polyphony and dialogism in legal discourse: Focus on syntactic negation”. In Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives, edited by G. Tessuto et al., 2–27. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2020). Communicating dissent in judicial opinions: A comparative, genre-based analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law = Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 33(2), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09711-y Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2024). Language and Legal Judgments. Evaluation and Argument in Judicial Discourse. London-New York: Routledge. Kurzon, D (2001). The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics 33/1: 61–85. McKeown, J. (2021). A corpus-based examination of reflexive metadiscourse in majority and dissent opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.019 Nikitina, J. (2025, forthcoming). Separate opinions. In Nikitina J. Human Rights Discourse: Linguistics, Translation and Genre at the European Court of Human Rights. London-New York: Routledge. Important dates Abstracts: by January 30, 2025Acceptance/rejection: February 15, 2025Full papers: April 30, 2025Acceptance/rejection: June 15, 2025Publication: September 2025 Please note that starting in 2025, all publications will require the use of APA 7ed. formatting style. Please prepare your manuscripts strictly according to the instructions in the manual (see: Guidelines). Manuscripts not prepared according to the guidelines will be rejected. For details, please contact the volume editors.Please send all documents and requests to both jekaterina.nikitina@unimi.it and kperuzzo@units.it https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/cl/announcement/view/653

CfP: Special issue on “The language of judges: exploring the discourse of separate opinions (Guest editors: Jekaterina Nikitina, University of MilanKatia Peruzzo, University of Trieste) Read More »

L. M. Crisafulli, S. Baieri, Carlotta Farese (eds) Imprinting Anglo- Italian Relations in The Liberal (Peter Lang)

Books, Members' Publications, News /

Imprinting Anglo- Italian Relations in The Liberal by Lilla Maria Crisafulli (Volume editor)Serena Baiesi (Volume editor) Carlotta Farese (Volume editor)  ©2023Edited Collection262 Pages   When the first issue of The Liberal was published on 10 October 1822, the periodical was largely dismissed by the British press as a political project conceived by well-known and controversial figures (L. Hunt, P.B. Shelley, Lord Byron, W. Hazlitt, and Mary Shelley). They were all members of the so-called “Pisan circle”, an Anglo-Italian community of liberal writers aspiring to cultural and social reform. Even though The Liberal was addressed to an English public, it was entirely conceived in Italy, a country which had become a symbolic as well as a geographical space, playing a crucial role in defining the journal’s aims and themes. This collection of essays examines the short and difficult life of the periodical, reassessing its cultural politics, its relationship to Italy, the controversial British reception, and its relevance to Romantic (and indeed contemporary) debates on Liberalism.

L. M. Crisafulli, S. Baieri, Carlotta Farese (eds) Imprinting Anglo- Italian Relations in The Liberal (Peter Lang) Read More »

CALL FOR PAPERSde genere – Rivista di studi letterari, postcoloniali e di genere

Members' Publications, News /

***CALL FOR PAPERS***de genere – Rivista di studi letterari, postcoloniali e di genere Ecologie femministe e intersezionali nella letteratura e nella cultura visualeA cura di Giulia Fabbri (Sapienza Università di Roma) e Chiara Xausa (Università di Bologna) In un articolo del 2008 dal titolo Ecofeminism without Nature?, Stacy Alaimo scrive che le possibilità di collegare femminismi e ambientalismo sono molteplici. Sarebbe però un errore, aggiunge, presupporre che i femminismi siano intrinsecamente ambientalisti o orientati verso la giustizia multispecie, dal momento che non esiste un’alleanza naturale tra queste prospettive. Poiché la storica associazione tra donne e natura è stata a lungo considerata una delle radici principali della sottomissione femminile, parte del femminismo ha tentato di separare la categoria di donna dalla sfera della natura per avvicinarla a quella della cultura – la cosiddetta flight from nature, “fuga dalla natura” (Alaimo 2000) –, rinunciando a interpretare criticamente e a superare il dualismo cultura/natura. L’ecofemminismo muove proprio da queste dicotomie gerarchizzanti (cultura/natura ma anche umano/non-umano, uomo/donna e molte altre) in cui il temine normativo incarna l’universalità mentre i soggetti altri vengono subordinati al mondo del non valore, e invita a superare la visione dualistica della realtà e i valori di dominio, sfruttamento e disuguaglianza che questa porta con sé. A partire dalla sua prima teorizzazione nello scritto di Françoise d’Eaubonne del 1974, Le féminisme ou la mort, l’ecofemminismo si sviluppa come una corrente del femminismo esplicitamente ecologica, che sostiene l’esistenza di una intersezione strutturale tra il dominio patriarcale delle donne e la subordinazione della natura. Questo numero di de genere intende allargare lo sguardo oltre la connessione donne-natura, con l’obiettivo di evidenziare come il pensiero elaborato da soggettività marginalizzate sulla base delle identità di genere e dell’orientamento sessuale, della razza, della disabilità e di altre categorie possa offrire un contributo prezioso alle traiettorie di ricerca delle Environmental Humanities. Accogliamo quindi contributi che rispondano all’invito fatto da Stacy Alaimo nel suo libro più recente Exposed. Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times (2016, tradotto in italiano nel 2024): creare nuove possibilità per rendere produttive e generative queste alleanze, tensioni e, a volte, contraddizioni ed estenderle oltre il territorio nel quale femminismi e ambientalismo sembrano sovrapporsi. Gli sviluppi teorici più recenti nell’ambito della riflessione sulle Environmental Humanities hanno messo in luce diverse intersezioni tra femminismi, teorie queer, giustizia climatica, questione animale e decolonialità, contribuendo a smantellare i rapporti su cui i sistemi di oppressione si reggono: si pensi, ad esempio, a Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation di Sunaura Taylor (2017), Aphro-ism: Essays on Pop Culture, Feminism, and Black Veganism from Two Sisters di Aph Ko e Syl Ko (2018), Queer Ecologies: Sex, Nature, Politics, Desire di Catriona Mortimer-Sandilands e Bruce Erickson (2010) e Queer Ecofeminism: From Binary Environmental Endeavours to Postgender Pursuits di Asmae Ourkiya (2023). Negli ultimi anni anche l’Italia ha assistito alla pubblicazione di importanti testi (italiani o tradotti) che propongono riflessioni sui sistemi di oppressione che coinvolgono in modo intersezionale tanto i soggetti umani quanto le molteplici alterità non umane – basti pensare, a titolo non esaustivo, ai volumi Per farla finita con la famiglia di Angela Balzano (2021), Cosa può un compost di Antonia Anna Ferrante (2022), Cospirazione animale di Marco Reggio (2022) e Animali si diventa di Federica Timeto (2024). Tali testi contribuiscono allo sviluppo nel contesto italiano di un dibattito e di una teorizzazione sulle articolazioni dell’Antropopatriarcato, in un momento storico, come quello attuale, in cui emerge in modo evidente come gli effetti della crisi ambientale hanno un impatto differenziato sulle diverse categorie di soggetti. Questo numero monografico intende mappare (in modo inevitabilmente parziale) le zone di interazione tra le teorie e le pratiche femministe intersezionali e le Environmental Humanities nella letteratura e nella cultura visuale di diversi contesti nazionali e/o attraverso una prospettiva comparata. Sia nella letteratura che nella cultura visuale, infatti, gli intrecci tra ecofemminismi e trasversalità delle lotte non sono ancora stati oggetto di analisi sistematiche. Siamo interessate quindi a contributi che analizzino le rappresentazioni culturali di tali intersezioni ponendo l’attenzione su differenti questioni (tra cui femminismo e postumano, ecofemminismo e intersezionalità, genere e cambiamento climatico, ecologie queer, questione animale) e attraverso diverse prospettive di analisi (tra cui studi post- e decoloniali, critical race theory, teoria queer, epistemologie indigene, disability studies). Una lista non esaustiva di possibili aree di indagine include: climate fiction/solarpunk/eco-fiction;teatro e arti performative;cinema, fotografia, televisione, webseriesarte, artivismo e pratiche estetiche Per proporre un contributo (articoli, interviste, interventi artistici) inviare un abstract di massimo 500 parole in italiano o in inglese e una breve biografia a degenere.journal@gmail.com e in CC a giulia.fabbri@uniroma1.it e chiara.xausa2@unibo.it. Per le linee guida per l’invio di una proposta ed altre informazioni controllate la nostra pagina con le linee guida. Consegna abstract: 30 settembre 2024Comunicazione articoli accettati: 15 ottobre 2024Consegna articoli: 15 febbraio 2025 Bibliografia Adams, Carol. 2020. Carne da macello. La politica sessuale della carne. Milano: Vanda, Milano. Alaimo, Stacey. 2008. “Ecofeminism Without Nature: Questioning the Relation Between Feminism and Evironmentalism”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10 (3): 299-304. Alaimo, Stacey. 2016. Exposed. Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Balzano, Angela, Elisa Bosisio e Ilaria Santoemma, a cura di. 2022. Conchiglie, pinguini staminali. Verso futuri transpecie. Roma: DeriveApprodi. Balzano, Angela. 2021. Per farla finita con la famiglia. Dall’aborto alle parentele postumane. Milano: Meltemi. Barad, Karen. 2017. Performatività della natura. Pisa: ETS. Braidotti, Rosi. 2020. Il postumano (3 Voll.). Roma: DeriveApprodi. d’Eaubonne, Françoise. 1974. Le féminisme ou la mort, P. Horay. Demos, T.J. 2017. Against the Anthropocene. Visual Culture and the Environment Today. London: Sternberg Press. Ferrante, Antonia Anna. 2022. Cosa può un compost. Fare con le ecologie femministe e queer. Roma: Luca Sossella Editore. Fiskio, Janet, 2021. Climate Change, Literature, and Environmental Justice. Poetics of Dissent and Repair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Guaraldo, Emiliano. 2022. “The Anthropocene and the Aesthetics of Planetary Abstraction”. In On the Interplay of Images. Imaginary and Imagination in Science Communication, a cura di Andreas Metzner-Szigeth, 163-178. Firenze: Olschki. Haraway, Donna. 2019. Chthulucene. Sopravvivere su un pianeta infetto. Roma: Nero. Ko,

CALL FOR PAPERSde genere – Rivista di studi letterari, postcoloniali e di genere Read More »

CfP “Cross-Media Languages. Applied Research, Digital Tools and Methodologies” (E-ISSN: 2974-8933)

Members' Publications, News /

È attiva la Call for Papers per il terzo fascicolo della rivista “Cross-Media Languages. Applied Research, Digital Tools and Methodologies” (E-ISSN: 2974-8933), consultabile all’indirizzo: https://ojs.cimedoc.uniba.it/index.php/cml/pages/view/callpapers La rivista, soggetta a revisione a doppio cieco, esplora le intersezioni tra ricerca, riflessione critica e sperimentazione didattica delle potenzialità applicative di strumenti e metodologie digitali nell’ambito della formazione linguistica, e privilegia un’ottica plurilingue. Essa si pone come luogo di confronto e dibattito secondo una cifra che è l’intersezione tra riflessione critica e sperimentazione applicativa, contaminazione tra tradizione e innovazione metodologica, con particolare riferimento alle potenzialità del digitale, in una prospettiva interdisciplinare e transmediale. Data di invio delle proposte corredate da abstract: 15 giugno 2024. Il fascicolo n. 3 (2025) uscirà nella primavera del 2025. Il secondo fascicolo (2024) è online e consultabile al link: https://ojs.cimedoc.uniba.it/index.php/cml/issue/view/185/showToc. Accanto alla sezione “Saggi – Essays”, il numero ripropone la sezione “Esperienze didattiche – Teaching practice” che presenta report di sperimentazioni didattiche innovative. Per maggiori informazioni: cml.journal@uniba.it

CfP “Cross-Media Languages. Applied Research, Digital Tools and Methodologies” (E-ISSN: 2974-8933) Read More »

CfP: BRNO Studies in English, Special Issue (proposed date, 2025) – Encounters with Water: An Ecolinguistic perspective

CfPs: Journals, Members' Publications, News /

BRNO Studies in English, Special Issue (proposed date, 2025) Encounters with Water: An Ecolinguistic perspective Environmental issues have seldom ranked higher in the agendas of public debate. The emergent research paradigm of Ecolinguistics (Fill and Mühlhäusler 2001, Fill and Penz 2018) represents the response to the crisis by ecologically-minded linguists, who may critique underlying socio-cognitive frameworks (Halliday 1990) or dominant anti-ecological narratives (Stibbe 2015). Within this framework, the topic of water occupies a place that is hard to define: though manifestly essential to the survival not just of the human species but to all life forms supported by the Earth, it somehow slips away from our attention. To most first worlders it represents a gift that may easily be taken for granted, while indigenous peoples may be only too aware of issues with access to it (Jackson 2018). Eco-awareness in contemporary social movements is frequently associated with the colour green – with plants, trees, flowers, forests – yet these features of the lifescape depend on the nourishing presence of water, its natural cycles and rhythms. Underlying Ecolinguistics are a range of philosophical and spiritual positions that have been characterised by Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess (1973) as consisting in either ‘shallow’ or ‘deep’ ecological perspectives. In the context of water, the former would refer to social practices that aim to guarantee access to this essential resource for human purposes like drinking, bathing or washing clothes. Such aspects reflect the instrumental view of Nature that typifies our current relationship with water as a resource, primarily as something that has an instrumental value. Deep ecology values water in a more profound sense. Of course, it would value and ‘venerate’ all the ‘ways and forms of life’ (Naess 1973: 95-6) that are found in seas, lakes and rivers. But more, it would seek to nurture a complete, holistic and open-hearted awareness of water as a vital element in our biosphere, and a respect for what it has represented historically and continues to represent today. Both approaches could support Ecolinguistic enquiries: for example, one could emphasise the social value of water, view it as the locus of modern territorial struggles in a context of droughts that motivate human migration. Water may be seen as a token for conflicts between industries that require water to run their factories and local populations who would rather see city parks enriched by unpolluted wetland environments. Alternatively, we could look with the eyes of artists and ecologists at water, towards those who have found spiritual meanings and unfolding identities in their ‘encounters with water’, meanings that connect denizens of the modern world with the ancient, traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples (Gottlieb 2004), and with some of the environmental voices from western literary and cultural traditions. Possible research areas for contributions include, but are not limited to, the following: Contributions should be theoretically grounded in any recognised sub-field of modern linguistics (Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Linguistic Ethnography, Critical Discourse Studies, Corpus Linguistics, Multimodality, Argumentation theory, Sociolinguistics, Ecostylistics, Cognitive Linguistics, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Narrative theory, etc.). We also welcome contributions from other research fields which use one or more of these methodologies, in the spirit of expanding the range of Ecolinguistics as a research paradigm. Important dates: Abstract submission: 30th June, notification of acceptance 31st July Submission of paper: 31st December 2024 EMAIL for contributions: encounterswithwater@gmail.com References Fill, Alwin, and Peter Mühlhäusler. 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment. London: Continuum. Fill, Alwin, and Hermine Penz, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. New York: Routledge. Gottlieb, Roger S., ed. 2004. This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. Halliday, M. A. K. 2010. On Language and Linguistics. London: Continuum. Jackson, Sue 2018. Indigenous peoples and water justice in a globalizing world. In Conca, K and Weinthal, E. (Eds). Oxford Handbook on Water Politics and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Naess, Arne. 1973. The Shallow and the Deep, Long-range Ecology Movement. A Summary. Inquiry 16(1–4):95–100. Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. London ; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Editors of the special issue: Douglas Mark Ponton dponton@unict.it University of Catania, Italy Cristina Arizzi, cristina.arizzi@unict.it University of Catania, Italy

CfP: BRNO Studies in English, Special Issue (proposed date, 2025) – Encounters with Water: An Ecolinguistic perspective Read More »

Torna in alto